America Suffers From Malignant Group Narcissism.
Isabel Wilkerson’s Pulitzer Prize-Winning Work Explains Why That Is.
In Caste, a searing exploration of race-based stratification in America, Isabel Wilkerson presents the reader with many occasions to pause, put down the work, and simply reflect on the bomb she has just dropped and its many implications. Today I want to explore just one of those, in which Wilkerson expertly dissects the role of narcissism in our society—and where it has led us.
Narcissism in a person is well understood as a condition of self-aggrandizing entitlement and disregard for others, one that usually grows out of a deep seated insecurity. In Greek mythology, Narcissus was a god who fell in love with his own reflection. Not realizing what it was he saw, Narcissus fell into a deep despair and died after his reflection spurned him. “Narcissus could not conceive he was in love with his own reflection,” wrote the psychologist Elsa Ronningstam. “He was caught in an illusion.”
Over the past four years, we have all had to witness, again and again, a kind of malignant narcissism strut itself about in the White House and on the international stage, and we all have a sense of the insecurities and hollowness that bred it. But what happens when an entire group within a society becomes infected with such narcissistic qualities?
The dominant caste in America, writes Wilkerson, is one “trained to believe in their inherent sovereignty.” Everything in society reflects back and reinforces this belief, from portrayals in film and television, to media stories, to representation in politics and business. The dominant caste sees itself naturally ensconced in places of power and therefore entitled to them, while sub-castes are viewed and portrayed as foreign, unworthy, lazy, violent or criminal. Through this repeating process of self-reflection and confirmation, the dominant caste falls in love with its own image again and again, and it simply will brook no other.
This group narcissism can lead many in the dominant caste quickly to assume all the characteristics of a narcissistic person, including the overestimation of their own position and the outright rejection of other images or narratives. The narcissism of the group fills a psychological gap as well: While individuals may each feel as though they themselves are nothing, if they can identify with a group that considers itself superior, they can become everything.
In short measure, the ideals espoused by the group (i.e. MAGA, white nationalists, white supremacists) become so important to the members that they are willing to sacrifice everything for them, even themselves. This is a kind of extreme identity politics that can lead to easy manipulation, incitement to violence, and even to fascism, as we saw in Nazi Germany and as we are seeing writ possible in modern America and India—three places, it so happens, which are explored in depth by Wilkerson after castes became encoded into the laws and social structures of an entire people.
A group under the spell of narcissistic fervor is eager to have a leader with whom it can identify. The adherents project their own narcissism onto him and merge their identities with his, and their own fortunes seem to rise and fall with his. “The narcissism of the leader,” Wilkerson writes, quoting the social theorist Erich Fromm, “who is convinced of his greatness, and who has no doubts, is precisely what attracts the narcissism of those who submit to him.”
It isn’t hard to see that Donald Trump is a narcissist of an extreme sort. What’s harder to grasp is that MAGA is actually a textbook collective narcissism, adoring of itself and its own reflection, disdainful or hating of others, and utterly dependent upon the perceived greatness of its leader. Like the group narcissism that infected the Nazis and most of Germany leading up to and including World War II, it isn’t hard for lies and distortions about other groups (Jews in Germany, racial minorities in America) to become readily accepted. And a collective lack of objectivity can quickly lead to disastrous consequences, as we have now witnessed with the Big Lie about the election and the insurrection at the Capitol.
As part of its malignant narcissism, which rejects anything but its own reflection, MAGA adherents resist suggestions that they share basic human experiences with those in lower, browner rungs of American society, which might explain their visceral denial of a concept as basic and uncontroversial as “Black Lives Matter.” To accept this would be to confront the very idea that there is deep injustice perpetrated against people just as deserving as they are of compassion and humanity.
So where does this leave us? To get past this troubling and destructive point in our history, we must first correctly diagnose the societal pathology we face. It is not enough to see MAGA as a cult and Trump as its leader. This is more specifically a cult that sees itself as the true defenders of a racial hierarchy, a caste system that forms the very identity of its adherents. Without that superior identity, there is simply too far for many in MAGA to fall, their shortcomings and actual relative lack of position within society laid bare by the dismantling of the racial hierarchy that once placed them high up. This is why many will fight and resist, even to what they believe is the bitter end, because the alternative is simply inconceivable.
An example of this is an article from The American Conservative, which ends with the totally non-racist and non-superiority identity question:
"I can’t stop asking myself the question: Why are they teaching non-white people to fear and loathe whites? What are they preparing America for?"
Basically, once again teaching the masses that "they're out to get us!" Right at the time of the Derek Chauvin trial.
Hi, Jay and team. As an outsider (non-American) and someone who has dabbled a little in sociology, my feeling is that this is where the "rugged individualism" cultural ethos of the USA has rubbed up against the evolutionary need for collectivism - which is of course, one of the many reasons that humans rose to the top of the food chain.
American exceptionalism and individuality are taught from the cradle, from what I understand (could be wrong - again, I'm an outsider, but I have read some interesting experiments that have taken place in daycare centres around the world and that have been replicated with pretty high accuracy). Collectivism is rejected as socialist/communist; teams are reserved for sports. The tight-knit nuclear family rules. This is in direct contrast to, say, Chinese culture, where the extended family and then the village are the cultural ethos.
However, our innate need for community cannot be simply subsumed by a cultural philosophy. This might help explain the enduring power of the church in the US, especially the growth of the megachurches and televangelists, when religious adherence in other first world countries has been falling since the 1960s. They give people something to believe in - a group to belong to. However, the grip of the churches seems to be slowly eroding and so, to me, the time was ripe for a Trump-like character to emerge to give those who were perhaps disillusioned with the churches something to adhere to. After all, the various falls from grace exhibited and publicised from all kinds of different religious groups are widely known. Meanwhile, disenfranchised Americans have seen the churches do nothing to improve their lives or their prospects. The churches weren't bringing back their livelihoods.
In comes Trump, who promises to do exactly that. The fervour of the revivalist movements of the late 1800-early 1900s can be seen in his mega rallies. He made concrete, simple promises. People didn't have to wait for the promise of a better afterlife - here was a guy that promised it here and now. And as far as they are concerned, he delivered. There's a reason why Trumpists call him "the best president America's ever had". Trying to convince them otherwise is like trying to convince a devout Christian that God doesn't exist. Facts are irrelevant. And they have loads of "facts" - cherrypicked, sure - but they are big lists of Trumps accomplishments. I read one once and it was almost enough to change my mind somewhat about Trump - at least until I looked into each and every one of them more fully.
People call it a cult. It's so, so much more than that. It's a cultural phenomenon that will not cede until the next conman comes along who is able to tap into that desperation to belong and to feel part of something bigger than themselves.
Sorry for the essay - Jay, I look forward so much to your well-researched and -articulated pieces. Thank you.