Yesterday, former President Trump suffered a resounding defeat at the Supreme Court, despite having appointed three of the justices on it, all of whom ruled against him. At issue are some 724 pages of documents over which Trump had attempted to assert executive privilege. His lawyers had filed suit on October 18, 2021 to stop the National Archives from producing the documents, even though Joe Biden, as the sitting president, had waived privilege over them.
I'm wondering if Justice Thomas voting against releasing these documents has anything to do with his wife's rumored involvement on 1/6? I also wonder how many members of Congress are named in these, as well? Should be interesting.
Reading these few privilege logs, I am surprised that they didn't just shred the documents and delete texts & emails. Yes, destruction of documents is a violation of the law, but they have violated so many laws, shredding evidence seems a minor infraction in comparison. It just goes to show how certain they were that they would be protected by their many cronies strategically planted in every branch of government. Speaking of cronies, why did Clarence Thomas not only recuse himself from this decision, but was so ballsy to even dissent given that his wife was front and center at the Jan. 6th Capitol attack!!?
First, thank GOD that Trump isn't president anymore! Second, I feel that there is backpedaling by *some* SCOTUS members here to hopefully reassert themselves as having been legitimately seated, given their questionable decisions of late. And after reading the summaries...*I* would want to know the complete contents of those documents!
I'm wondering if Justice Thomas voting against releasing these documents has anything to do with his wife's rumored involvement on 1/6? I also wonder how many members of Congress are named in these, as well? Should be interesting.
Reading these few privilege logs, I am surprised that they didn't just shred the documents and delete texts & emails. Yes, destruction of documents is a violation of the law, but they have violated so many laws, shredding evidence seems a minor infraction in comparison. It just goes to show how certain they were that they would be protected by their many cronies strategically planted in every branch of government. Speaking of cronies, why did Clarence Thomas not only recuse himself from this decision, but was so ballsy to even dissent given that his wife was front and center at the Jan. 6th Capitol attack!!?
Please write a song called "Thank God for the bureaucrats". Thank you.
First, thank GOD that Trump isn't president anymore! Second, I feel that there is backpedaling by *some* SCOTUS members here to hopefully reassert themselves as having been legitimately seated, given their questionable decisions of late. And after reading the summaries...*I* would want to know the complete contents of those documents!
Here's hoping that there's more than one GOP senator or rep. that's REALLY worried, now. Particularly that vile Senator from Texas, among others...