Investigative journalist for The Guardian Hugo Lowell proved again that he is at the forefront of exposing the plot within the White House to overturn the 2020 election. In a report filed yesterday, Lowell dropped a bombshell about the true origins of the false conspiracy surrounding Dominion Voting Systems, which lies at the heart of Big Lie that the 2020 election was stolen.
Seems to me that the bad guys are setting up their defense to be that they had believable information and intel regarding voter fraud. This smells of the same kind of intel from a single Iraqui source that guided much of the Bush administration to press for the Gulf war.
Hugo Lowell's article conrains a photo of Miller's dated, original "report" & the intentionally fradulent "report" which lawyer's call consciousness of guilt and Judges call "men's rea" an essential element of criminal liability. "Would the Clerk read the Verdict".
I'm not saying it would or should prevail, but I think we may see the defense attorneys in the Fox and other "stolen election" lawsuits using the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" gambit. "If the United States military and its allies could declare war on Iraq (and sacrifice hundreds of thousands of lives) based on intelligence that only later proved to be false and misleading, then why should *trump, FoxNews, and their fellow travellers be expected to have higher standards than the U.S. government?"
But will any of the findings matter? They still believe that the election was stolen. Nothing seems to ‘cross a line’ to the loyal followers.
And the plot continues to thicken.
Seems to me that the bad guys are setting up their defense to be that they had believable information and intel regarding voter fraud. This smells of the same kind of intel from a single Iraqui source that guided much of the Bush administration to press for the Gulf war.
Hugo Lowell's article conrains a photo of Miller's dated, original "report" & the intentionally fradulent "report" which lawyer's call consciousness of guilt and Judges call "men's rea" an essential element of criminal liability. "Would the Clerk read the Verdict".
81M > 74M
81M > 74M
I'm not saying it would or should prevail, but I think we may see the defense attorneys in the Fox and other "stolen election" lawsuits using the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" gambit. "If the United States military and its allies could declare war on Iraq (and sacrifice hundreds of thousands of lives) based on intelligence that only later proved to be false and misleading, then why should *trump, FoxNews, and their fellow travellers be expected to have higher standards than the U.S. government?"