9 Comments
User's avatar
Kim's avatar

But will any of the findings matter? They still believe that the election was stolen. Nothing seems to ‘cross a line’ to the loyal followers.

Expand full comment
Stephen F. Duncan's avatar

And the plot continues to thicken.

Expand full comment
David Bishop's avatar

Seems to me that the bad guys are setting up their defense to be that they had believable information and intel regarding voter fraud. This smells of the same kind of intel from a single Iraqui source that guided much of the Bush administration to press for the Gulf war.

Expand full comment
Ruth Withey's avatar

Do you mean the Iraqi war begun in 2003 under GW Bush on the false claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction? The Gulf War was in 1991 when & because Kuwait was invaded while GHW Bush was president.

Expand full comment
David Bishop's avatar

You're right...the Iraq war...I shouldn't write while decaffeinated.

Expand full comment
Bryan Sean McKown's avatar

Hugo Lowell's article conrains a photo of Miller's dated, original "report" & the intentionally fradulent "report" which lawyer's call consciousness of guilt and Judges call "men's rea" an essential element of criminal liability. "Would the Clerk read the Verdict".

Expand full comment
jh's avatar

81M > 74M

Expand full comment
jh's avatar

81M > 74M

Expand full comment
RICH GOPEN's avatar

I'm not saying it would or should prevail, but I think we may see the defense attorneys in the Fox and other "stolen election" lawsuits using the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" gambit. "If the United States military and its allies could declare war on Iraq (and sacrifice hundreds of thousands of lives) based on intelligence that only later proved to be false and misleading, then why should *trump, FoxNews, and their fellow travellers be expected to have higher standards than the U.S. government?"

Expand full comment