7 Comments

Thank you; excellent analysis of the Issues, the Rules, their Application & Conclusions ( i. R.A.C.)

I do disagree with Pence's Attorney's estimate (Exhibit N) of the projected SCOTUS' vote. That vote would likely be 8- 1 with Ginny Thomas & her husband, Justice Thomas, voting to support the gross common law fraud. Justice Thomas will not dischatge his duty to recuse himself. So the estimated vote at Conference would be 8-1 if not 8-0.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dem Supp for your positive note on my March 2022 Kuo Post. I will have to check the SCOTUS Docket right away. Clearly, tfg is risking a possible humulitating defeat.

Expand full comment

This is the best news yet. It leaves me hopeful that accountability may actually have a chance.

Expand full comment

There is a world of difference between what so many foolishly elevate by calling conspiracy "theories" and what are demonstrated by a pile of hard evidence arrayed to show clearly criminal acts of conspiracy. Thank you, Jay, for this meticulous legal description and analysis. Now the wheels of justice have all the grist they need to begin turning productively in earnest.

Expand full comment

Yes thanks Jay for this awesome explanation! Now hopefully it goes somewhere

Expand full comment

Thank you for this. So thorough and so clearly written, even for those of us who know nothing about the legal field!

Expand full comment

Thank you Jay. Professional, knowledgeable, analysis as always.

Expand full comment