We’re in an era of political bombshells, so the disclosure of handwritten notes, taken by Justice Department official Richard Donoghue during former president Trump’s conversations with acting Attorney General Rosen, were met with a shrug by many last week. But the notes shouldn’t be so readily dismissed. Apart from the surprising twist that led to their disclosure—on the heels of a full reversal by the Department of Justice over whether they were protected by executive privilege—the notes are strong and direct evidence of what prosecutors call
My question is would Trump's attempts to influence the election results personally in multiple states be applicable as evidence in a Sedition Conspiracy case as well?
This article is about Trump's risk of prosecution, but it starts off talking about the Hatch Act. Sadly the Hatch Act doesn't apply to the POTUS or VPOTUS. Am I misunderstanding the article?
My question is would Trump's attempts to influence the election results personally in multiple states be applicable as evidence in a Sedition Conspiracy case as well?
So glad that Garland is on the case - fine prosecutor he was particularly with terrorists and mobsters ...
This article is about Trump's risk of prosecution, but it starts off talking about the Hatch Act. Sadly the Hatch Act doesn't apply to the POTUS or VPOTUS. Am I misunderstanding the article?