6 Comments

My question is would Trump's attempts to influence the election results personally in multiple states be applicable as evidence in a Sedition Conspiracy case as well?

Expand full comment

It would be relevant evidence

Expand full comment

So glad that Garland is on the case - fine prosecutor he was particularly with terrorists and mobsters ...

Expand full comment

This article is about Trump's risk of prosecution, but it starts off talking about the Hatch Act. Sadly the Hatch Act doesn't apply to the POTUS or VPOTUS. Am I misunderstanding the article?

Expand full comment

My understanding is that the Hatch Act has a criminal portion that was applies to any office holder.

Expand full comment

That would apply specifically to people holding office I would think, as to whether or not they could be removed from office. The second portion speaks to criminal activity for political gain, and the DoJ just turned down Rep Brooks request for representation by them, and this would be similar circumstances. And, of course, Mr Trump is no longer POTUS, despite what he may claim. That is how it looks to me, anyway.

Expand full comment