1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

I think you're right, Judy. I would hope that in the debate instead of spending his time and effort to play wack a mole with vance's lying (because CBS won't have their moderators fact check vance because they don't want trump getting furious with them for fact checking him for 90 minutes - let Walz do it instead). I hope he asks him some rhetorical question like "Wow, you really think people are going to believe that that stuff? Wierd." Walz can also hit him repeatedly on his admitting on CNN that he created the story about the Springfield Haitians eating pets and that vance admitted he knows it isn't true and has knowingly caused harm to his own constituents in his quest to become VP. Who wants a VP that willingly harms his own constituents? Think of the damage he could do other working people. I think Walz could really have some fun with vance precisely because vance has no sense of humor and is thin skinned and uber-arrogant and he seems to love to troll him anyway and is good at it, too.

Expand full comment